Pieter Gautier, Bo Hu, Makoto Watanabe
VU University Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute
buying/selling price, inventory holdings
transaction/participation fees, no inventory
How intermediaries determine the intermediation structure?
(middleman mode is less frictional)
(market-maker mode decreases competitive pressure)
$V^s=\eta^s(1-p^s-f)>\lambda^b\beta$
$V^m=\eta^m(1-p^m)>\lambda^b\beta$
$\eta^m=\frac{\min\{K,x^m\}}{x^m}=1$
in the equilibrium, $K=x^m$
$\eta^s=\frac{1-e^{-x^s}}{x^s}<1$
Proposition 1 (Pure middleman)
Given single-market search technologies, the intermediary will not open the platform and will act as a pure middleman with $x^m = K = B$, serving all buyers for sure.
Timing issue: first mover advantage
Incentive constraint (buyers)
$1-p^m > \lambda^b P^s(x^m) \beta$
$1-p^s -f> \lambda^b P^s(x^m) \beta$
Incentive constraint (sellers)
$p^s > \lambda^s P^b(x^m) (1-\beta)$
Intermediary structure influences competitive pressure
$P^s(x^m)$ is increasing in $x^m$
More transactions
Middleman is efficient in matching demand and supply
Less profit per transaction
Middleman creates more competitive pressure
Proposition 2 (Active Market-maker)
Given multi-market search technologies, the intermediary will open a platform and act as:
(1) a market-making middleman if
$\lambda^b \beta \leq 1/2$ or if $\lambda^b \beta > 1/2$ and $B/S \geq c$
(2) a pure marketmaker if
$\lambda^b \beta > 1/2$ and $B/S < c$
Assumption
In the wholesale market, the middleman can access a fraction $\alpha$ of sellers:
$K \leq \alpha S$.
Proposition 3
The intermediation chooses to be a market-making middleman or a pure market-maker with
$x^m \leq K = \alpha S$.